Re: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.14 for 2.6.17
From: Mathieu Desnoyers
Date: Tue Sep 26 2006 - 18:28:23 EST
* Jeremy Fitzhardinge (jeremy@xxxxxxxx) wrote:
> Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> >Constructing on Jeremy Fitzhardinge's comments about gcc optimizations, I
> >rewrote (once more) the markers mechanism so that the optimized mode does
> >jump between two different inline asm. Instead, the optimized version uses
> >load immediate (in assembly) that will be used by a test to decide of a
> >(in C).
> I should have spelled out my point a bit more. If you've got a flag
> you're just testing, couldn't you just do:
> if (__mark_enabled_##name)
> and do without the asms or the section?
Because a supplementary memory read is added on the critical path with a normal
flag test. The assembly can provide an immediate value without any need of
memory read from the data section.
To change the behavior of the program, I just have to change the immediate value
in the movb instruction.
However, the non-optimized generic version does exactly this : it simply tests a
flag loaded from memory. It can be very useful on embedded systems where the
code is in read-only memory.
OpenPGP public key: http://krystal.dyndns.org:8080/key/compudj.gpg
Key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/