Re: [PATCH] i386/x86_64 signal handler arg fixes

[Andi Kleen]

On Thursday 14 September 2006 10:34, Albert Cahalan wrote:

> For i386, the non-RT frame is wrong. It was using the raw sig value
> instead of the translated value, and did not pass the semi-documented
> extra parameters.

The translation is not needed because x86-64 doesn't support iBCS at all
and afaik it was only used for that.

>
> For x86-64, the regparm 3 calling convention was simply missing.

Ok that should be added.

Can you please send a single patch that just does this?

-Andi

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/