Re: [Fastboot] [CFT] ELF Relocatable x86 and x86_64 bzImages

From: Vivek Goyal
Date: Mon Jul 31 2006 - 16:59:29 EST


On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 04:25:20PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 10:19:04AM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >
> > I have spent some time and have gotten my relocatable kernel patches
> > working against the latest kernels. I intend to push this upstream
> > shortly.
> >
> > Could all of the people who care take a look and test this out
> > to make certain that it doesn't just work on my test box?
> >
> Hi Eric,
>
> Currently I am testing your patches on i386. With CONFIG_RELOCATABLE=y
> kernel boots fine and kexec also works.
>
> But my kernel hangs on kexec on panic case. It hangs early in
> decompress_kernel(). Kernel hangs at following condition.
>
> + if (((u32)output - CONFIG_PHYSICAL_START) & 0x3fffff)
> + error("Destination address not 4M aligned");
>

Ok. I am decompressing the kernel to 16MB and after reducing 1MB of
CONFIG_PHYSICAL_START I am left with 15MB which is not 4M aligned
hence I seems to be running into it.

I changed it to

if ((u32)output) & 0x3fffff)

and kdump kernel booted fine. But this will run into issues if I load
kernel at 1MB.

I got a dump question. Why do I have to load the kernel at 4MB alignment?
Existing kernel boots loads at 1MB, which is non 4MB aligned and it works
fine?

Thanks
Vivek
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/