Re: [BUG] sched: big numa dynamic sched domain memory corruption

[Paul Jackson]

> Paul can you please test the mainline code and confirm?

Sure - which version of Linus and/or Andrew's tree is the minimum
worth testing?

Could you explain why you don't think the mainline has this
problem?  I still see the critical code piece there:

  #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
                if (cpus_weight(*cpu_map)
                                > SD_NODES_PER_DOMAIN*cpus_weight(nodemask)) {

What other critical bugs are fixed between the SLES10 variant
and the mainline?

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@xxxxxxx> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/