Re: [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean (version 6)

From: Josef Sipek
Date: Thu Jul 27 2006 - 00:39:17 EST

On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 05:51:10AM +0200, ricknu-0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Hope it make some sense.

Fair enough.

> PS
> If I got you wrong and you meant why it can't be defined where it is used, I
> refere you to Andrew's mail "[patch 1/1] consolidate TRUE and FALSE", where a
> redefinition occured (of TRUE/FALSE).

You first guess was right.

Josef "Jeff" Sipek.

NT is to UNIX what a doughnut is to a particle accelerator.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at