Re: [PATCH 18-rc2] Fix "can not" in Documentation and Kconfig

From: Randy.Dunlap
Date: Thu Jul 27 2006 - 00:03:42 EST

Next message: Locke: " It?s a pity, because you could do it with her much longer!"
Previous message: ricknu-0: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean (version 6)"
In reply to: Matt LaPlante: "[PATCH 18-rc2] Fix "can not" in Documentation and Kconfig"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, 26 Jul 2006 19:20:29 -0400 Matt LaPlante wrote:

> Randy brought it to my attention that in proper english "can not" should always be written "cannot". I donot see any reason to argue, even if I mightnot understand why this rule exists. This patch fixes "can not" in several Documentation files as well as three Kconfigs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matt LaPlante <kernel1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> --

Thanks, Matt.

Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Locke: " It?s a pity, because you could do it with her much longer!"
Previous message: ricknu-0: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean (version 6)"
In reply to: Matt LaPlante: "[PATCH 18-rc2] Fix "can not" in Documentation and Kconfig"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]