Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by regarding reiser4 inclusion

From: andrea
Date: Wed Jul 26 2006 - 18:13:59 EST

On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 05:37:57PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> This is where we disagree. It may be wrong, but it's certainly not
> nearly *as* wrong....


My point of view in saying you can't dismiss the current KLive stats
completely, is simply that I didn't expect reiser4 numbers to be so
high even in the small sample of the brave KLive project that is full
of people willing to test new stuff (also note that I compared it to
isofs, I didn't attempt a comparison with ext3 myself). That makes it
a positive in my view.

If you think KLive numbers aren't a positive point for reiser4, then
it can only mean you expected them to be even higher than they were...
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at