Re: [PATCH] Make touch_nmi_watchdog imply touch_softlockup_watchdog on all archs

[Ingo Molnar]

* Michal Schmidt <xschmi00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> touch_nmi_watchdog() calls touch_softlockup_watchdog() on both 
> architectures that implement it (i386 and x86_64). On other 
> architectures it does nothing at all. touch_nmi_watchdog() should 
> imply touch_softlockup_watchdog() on all architectures. Suggested by 
> Andi Kleen.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michal Schmidt <xschmi00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>

although i suspect this could be cleaned up by consolidating both under 
touch_watchdog(), right?

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/