Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH] [6/6] i386: Move CONFIG_DOUBLEFAULT into arch/i386 where it belongs.

[Andi Kleen]

On Tuesday 18 April 2006 21:05, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 12:35:22PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
> >...
> 
> NAK.
> 
> When submitting a patch that is the revert of a patch that went 
> into Linus' tree just 8 days ago [1], I'd expect at least:
> - a Cc to the people involved with the patch you are reverting
> - a note that you are reverting a recent patch in your patch
>   description
> - an explanation why you disagree with the patch you are reverting

The subject was very clear. i386 options belong into arch/i386.

> If you disagree with a patch, please speak up when it's submitted or 
> discuss it after you've seen it in the tree. But don't play such silly
> revert-and-hope-they-don't-notice-I've-reverted-it games.

I moved it because I noticed that my x86-64 configuration files 
had this strange new symbol. I also did a grep and no other architecture
other than i386 uses it.

i386 specific hacks belong into arch/i386

-Andi (who actually thinks the whole thing was always a bad idea - saving
a few K but giving up such debugging is a poor trade off)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/