Re: [PATCH 06/16] mm: balance slab aging

From: Nick Piggin
Date: Wed Dec 07 2005 - 06:33:31 EST


Wu Fengguang wrote:
A question about the current one:

For a NUMA system with N nodes, the way kswapd calculates lru_pages - only sum
up local zones - may cause N times more shrinking than a 1-CPU system.


But it is equal pressure for all pools involved in being scaned the
simplifying assumption is that slab is equally distributed among
nodes. And yeah, scanning would load up when more than 1 kswapd is
running.

I had patches to do per-zone inode and dentry slab shrinking ages
ago, but nobody was interested... so I'm guessing it is a feature :)

--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.

Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com -
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/