[PATCH 2.6.14-git13] ipmi: inconsistent spin_lock in ipmi_smi_msg_received

[Hironobu Ishii]

Hi Corey,

You revert a patch by mistake in the following patch 
     > Date Fri, 21 Oct 2005 09:49:09 -0500 
     > From Corey Minyard <> 
     > Subject [PATCH 1/9] ipmi: use refcount in message handler 

(http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/10/21/85)


Signed-off-by: Hironobu Ishii <hishii@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

diff -urNp linux-2.6.14-git13/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c linux-2.6.14-git13.modified/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c
--- linux-2.6.14-git13/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c	2005-11-11 10:50:37.000000000 +0900
+++ linux-2.6.14-git13.modified/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c	2005-11-11 19:53:21.000000000 +0900
@@ -2648,7 +2648,7 @@ void ipmi_smi_msg_received(ipmi_smi_t   
	spin_lock_irqsave(&intf->waiting_msgs_lock, flags);
	if (!list_empty(&intf->waiting_msgs)) {
		list_add_tail(&msg->link, &intf->waiting_msgs);
-		spin_unlock(&intf->waiting_msgs_lock);
+		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&intf->waiting_msgs_lock, flags);
		goto out;
	}
	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&intf->waiting_msgs_lock, flags);
@@ -2657,9 +2657,9 @@ void ipmi_smi_msg_received(ipmi_smi_t   
	if (rv > 0) {
		/* Could not handle the message now, just add it to a
                   list to handle later. */
-		spin_lock(&intf->waiting_msgs_lock);
+		spin_lock_irqsave(&intf->waiting_msgs_lock, flags);
		list_add_tail(&msg->link, &intf->waiting_msgs);
-		spin_unlock(&intf->waiting_msgs_lock);
+		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&intf->waiting_msgs_lock, flags);
	} else if (rv == 0) {
		ipmi_free_smi_msg(msg);
	}