Re: Nick's core remove PageReserved broke vmware...

From: Gleb Natapov
Date: Thu Nov 10 2005 - 08:27:37 EST


On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 01:21:25PM +0000, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > Quoting Gleb Natapov <gleb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 02:48:53PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > > Also perhapse we should skip VM_SHARED VMAs?
> > > >
> > > > Why?
> > > >
> > > They will work correctly across fork().
> >
> > So why would I call madvise on such a VMA?
>
> To avoid the overhead of forking it e.g. if it's a large nonlinear vma,
> a lot of time may be wasted on copying its ptes for fork. That's one
> of the reasons I came to like your DONTCOPY.
>
> So, it may not be useful for your particular RDMA issue, but I see no
> reason to exclude VM_SHARED vmas from the madvise, and good reason to
> include them.
>
If the scope of DONTCOPY is more broad that just RDMA then I agree.

--
Gleb.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/