[PATCH] mm: poison struct page for ptlock

[Hugh Dickins]

The split ptlock patch enlarged the default SMP PREEMPT struct page from
32 to 36 bytes on most 32-bit platforms, from 32 to 44 bytes on PA-RISC
7xxx (without PREEMPT).  That was not my intention, and I don't believe
that split ptlock deserves any such slice of the user's memory.

While leaving most of the page_private() mods in place for the moment,
could we please try this patch, or something like it?  Again to overlay
the spinlock_t from &page->private onwards, with corrected BUILD_BUG_ON
that we don't go beyond ->lru; with poisoning of the fields overlaid,
and unsplit config verifying that the split config is safe to use them.

Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 include/linux/mm.h |   69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

--- 2.6.14-git6/include/linux/mm.h	2005-11-03 18:38:01.000000000 +0000
+++ linux/include/linux/mm.h	2005-11-03 18:46:06.000000000 +0000
@@ -226,18 +226,19 @@ struct page {
 					 * to show when page is mapped
 					 * & limit reverse map searches.
 					 */
-	union {
-		unsigned long private;	/* Mapping-private opaque data:
+	unsigned long private;		/* Mapping-private opaque data:
 					 * usually used for buffer_heads
 					 * if PagePrivate set; used for
 					 * swp_entry_t if PageSwapCache
 					 * When page is free, this indicates
 					 * order in the buddy system.
 					 */
-#if NR_CPUS >= CONFIG_SPLIT_PTLOCK_CPUS
-		spinlock_t ptl;
-#endif
-	} u;
+	/*
+	 * Along with private, the mapping, index and lru fields of a
+	 * page table page's struct page may be overlaid by a spinlock
+	 * for pte locking: see comment on "split ptlock" below.  Please
+	 * do not rearrange these fields without considering that usage.
+	 */
 	struct address_space *mapping;	/* If low bit clear, points to
 					 * inode address_space, or NULL.
 					 * If page mapped as anonymous
@@ -265,8 +266,8 @@ struct page {
 #endif /* WANT_PAGE_VIRTUAL */
 };
 
-#define page_private(page)		((page)->u.private)
-#define set_page_private(page, v)	((page)->u.private = (v))
+#define page_private(page)		((page)->private)
+#define set_page_private(page, v)	((page)->private = (v))
 
 /*
  * FIXME: take this include out, include page-flags.h in
@@ -787,25 +788,67 @@ static inline pmd_t *pmd_alloc(struct mm
 }
 #endif /* CONFIG_MMU && !__ARCH_HAS_4LEVEL_HACK */
 
+/*
+ * In the split ptlock case, we shall be overlaying the struct page
+ * of a page table page with a spinlock starting at &page->private,
+ * ending dependent on architecture and config, but never beyond lru.
+ *
+ * So poison the struct page in all cases (in part to assert our
+ * territory: that pte locking owns these fields of a page table
+ * struct page), and verify it when freeing in the unsplit ptlock
+ * case, when none of these fields should have been touched.
+ * Poison lru back-to-front, to make sure list_del was not used.
+ *
+ * The time may come when important configs requiring split ptlock
+ * have a spinlock_t which cannot fit here: then kmalloc a spinlock_t
+ * (perhaps in its own cacheline) and keep the pointer in struct page.
+ */
+static inline void poison_struct_page(struct page *page)
+{
+	page->private = (unsigned long) page;
+	page->mapping = (struct address_space *) page;
+	page->index   = (pgoff_t) page;
+	page->lru.next = LIST_POISON2;
+	page->lru.prev = LIST_POISON1;
+}
+
+static inline void verify_struct_page(struct page *page)
+{
+	BUG_ON(page->private != (unsigned long) page);
+	BUG_ON(page->mapping != (struct address_space *) page);
+	BUG_ON(page->index   != (pgoff_t) page);
+	BUG_ON(page->lru.next != LIST_POISON2);
+	BUG_ON(page->lru.prev != LIST_POISON1);
+	/*
+	 * Reset page->mapping so free_pages_check won't complain.
+	 */
+	page->mapping = NULL;
+}
+
 #if NR_CPUS >= CONFIG_SPLIT_PTLOCK_CPUS
 /*
  * We tuck a spinlock to guard each pagetable page into its struct page,
  * at page->private, with BUILD_BUG_ON to make sure that this will not
- * overflow into the next struct page (as it might with DEBUG_SPINLOCK).
- * When freeing, reset page->mapping so free_pages_check won't complain.
+ * overflow beyond page->lru (as it might with PA-RISC DEBUG_SPINLOCK).
  */
-#define __pte_lockptr(page)	&((page)->u.ptl)
+#define __pte_lockptr(page)	((spinlock_t *)&((page)->private))
 #define pte_lock_init(_page)	do {					\
+	BUILD_BUG_ON(__pte_lockptr((struct page *)0) + 1 >		\
+			(spinlock_t *)(&((struct page *)0)->lru + 1));	\
+	poison_struct_page(_page);					\
 	spin_lock_init(__pte_lockptr(_page));				\
 } while (0)
+/*
+ * When freeing, reset page->mapping so free_pages_check won't complain.
+ */
 #define pte_lock_deinit(page)	((page)->mapping = NULL)
 #define pte_lockptr(mm, pmd)	({(void)(mm); __pte_lockptr(pmd_page(*(pmd)));})
 #else
 /*
  * We use mm->page_table_lock to guard all pagetable pages of the mm.
  */
-#define pte_lock_init(page)	do {} while (0)
-#define pte_lock_deinit(page)	do {} while (0)
+#define pte_lock_init(page)	poison_struct_page(page)
+#define pte_lock_deinit(page)	verify_struct_page(page)
 #define pte_lockptr(mm, pmd)	({(void)(pmd); &(mm)->page_table_lock;})
 #endif /* NR_CPUS < CONFIG_SPLIT_PTLOCK_CPUS */
 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/