Re: reiser4 plugins

From: Jeremy Maitin-Shepard
Date: Tue Jul 05 2005 - 18:28:05 EST


David Masover <ninja@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Jeremy Maitin-Shepard wrote:
>> David Masover <ninja@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>>
>>>> I have. And have seen /no/ benefit to you. Except, of course, the benefit
>>>> accrued from some magic in Linus' kernel, by which all format differences
>>>> go in a puff of smoke if they are implemented inside it, and furthermore
>>>> all userland gets rebuilt to use the kernel's way overnight.
>>
>>
>>> Let's say cryptocompress gets implemented. Not all of userland
>>> rewritten, not even any of userland rewritten, just a cryptocompress
>>> plugin for the kernel. And instead of having to learn a new tool, I can
>>> just browse around in /meta.
>>
>>
>> What is the relationship between file-as-dir or special meta-data and
>> transparent encryption+compression? I do not see why file-as-dir would
>> require such a special interface.

I mistyped this --- I meant to ask "why transparent
encryption+compression would require such a special interface."

> I'm ignoring file-as-dir until/unless someone figures out a sane way of
> doing it.

[snip]

> Some methods actually do something, like secret.txt/compression.

[snip]

Okay, so you are suggesting that file-as-dir would provide the user
interface for enabling the encryption or compression. Alternatively,
though, an ioctl could be used to control compression and encryption.

--
Jeremy Maitin-Shepard
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/