Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, plist fixes

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Sun, 2005-06-05 at 10:26 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> > Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2005 02:17:12 +0200

:)

> but i think the fundamental question remains even on Sunday mornings -
> is the plist overhead worth it? Compared to the simple sorted list we 
> exchange O(nr_RT_tasks_running) for O(nr_RT_levels_used) [which is in 
> the 1-100 range], is that a significant practical improvement? By 
> overhead i dont just mean cycle cost, but also architectural flexibility 
> and maintainability.

That was my question too. 

tglx


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/