Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/5] bdev: execute in place (V2)

From: Carsten Otte
Date: Wed May 18 2005 - 10:48:38 EST


Christoph Hellwig wrote:

>>+ int (*direct_access) (struct inode *, sector_t, unsigned long *);
>>
>>
>
>this should have a block_device * first argument.
>
>
While I agree that (block_device *) would be a good thing to address
the target block device, the inode * is consistent with other
operations in this vector: open, release, & ioctl use the same scheme.
The reason for inode * here is that the caller has no easy way to get
to the block_device *. How would the filesystem do that?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/