Re: [patch 0/6] latest bugfixes for 2.6.12

[Blaisorblade]

On Tuesday 10 May 2005 01:45, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Here are some more fixes intended for 2.6.12 (and well tested). Can you
> > merge them soon, Andrew? Thanks.
>
> Sure.

> > The first is a particularly bad one since it shows up when you *start*
> > compiling UML (due to a quilt patch -> normal patch conversion problem, a
> > file wasn't actually deleted, but it was when applied through quilt). Was
> > this too quick a merge, maybe? What's your "merging policy" (if any) for
> > patches?

> Jeff sent in fixes which were dependent on other things I had, we're maybe
> several weeks away from 2.6.12,
Several weeks away? Ok, that's nice to know, so we are not in a hurry 
(especially since I'm totally busy). When I'll have time I'll flush out the 
rest of what I have in my tree.
> so I figured there was plenty of time to 
> get things fixed up - best to get it all flushed out and fix any fallout
> rather than hang around, given that UML seems to be still changing in
> fairly significant ways.
Ok, I had guessed we were near to the release instead.
-- 
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
Skype user "PaoloGiarrusso"
Linux registered user n. 292729
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/