Re: [patch 0/6] latest bugfixes for 2.6.12

[Andrew Morton]

Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Here are some more fixes intended for 2.6.12 (and well tested). Can you merge 
> them soon, Andrew? Thanks.

Sure.

> The first is a particularly bad one since it shows up when you *start* 
> compiling UML (due to a quilt patch -> normal patch conversion problem, a 
> file wasn't actually deleted, but it was when applied through quilt). Was 
> this too quick a merge, maybe? What's your "merging policy" (if any) for 
> patches?

Jeff sent in fixes which were dependent on other things I had, we're maybe
several weeks away from 2.6.12, so I figured there was plenty of time to
get things fixed up - best to get it all flushed out and fix any fallout
rather than hang around, given that UML seems to be still changing in
fairly significant ways.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/