Re: 2.6.10-bkcurr: major slab corruption preventing booting on ARM

From: Ben Dooks
Date: Tue Jan 04 2005 - 12:20:52 EST


On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 04:10:49PM +0000, Russell King wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 02:43:50PM +0000, Russell King wrote:
> > I've had a report from a fellow ARM hacker of their platform not
> > booting. After they turned on slab debugging, they saw (pieced
> > together from a report on IRC):
> >
> > Freeing init memory: 104K
> > run_init_process(/bin/bash)
> > Slab corruption: start=c0010934, len=160
> > Last user: [<c00adc54>](d_alloc+0x28/0x2d8)
> >
> > I've just run up 2.6.10-bkcurr on a different ARM platform, and
> > encountered the following output. It looks like there's serious
> > slab corruption issues in these kernels.
> >
> > I'll dig a little further into the report below to see if there's
> > anything obvious.
>
> Ok, reverting the pud_t patch fixes both these problems (the exact
> patch can be found at: http://www.home.arm.linux.org.uk/~rmk/misc/bk4-bk5
> Note that this is not a plain bk4-bk5 patch, but just the pud_t
> changes brought forward to bk6 or there abouts.)
>
> So, something in the 4 level page table patches is causing random
> scribbling in kernel memory.

I've tried that, and it fixes the problems for me on
the EB2410ITX (ARM9 2410) and the corruption of the initial-ramdisk.

--
Ben (ben@xxxxxxxxx, http://www.fluff.org/)

'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/