Re: 2.6.10-mm1

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 10:04:08AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> or is it the addition of _smp_processor_id() as a way to signal 'this
> smp_processor_id() call in a preemptible region is fine, trust me'?

Yes.

> We
> could do smp_processor_id_preempt() or some other name - any better
> suggestions?

I'd just kill the debug check and rely on the eye of the review to not
let new users of smp_processor_id slip in.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/