Re: [PATCH 1/3] ext3 reservation remove stale window fix

[Matt Mackall]

On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 06:11:16PM -0700, Mingming Cao wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-10-18 at 16:41, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 03:55:04PM -0700, Mingming Cao wrote:
> > > 
> > > Before we changed the per-filesystem reservations from a linked list
> > > to a red-black tree, in order to speed up the linear search from the
> > > list head, we keep the current(stale) reservation window as a
> > > reference pointer to skip the nodes prior to the current/stale
> > > window node, when failed to allocate a new window in current group
> > > and try to do allocation in next group.
> > 
> > One wonders whether a prio tree of the sort used by the current VMA
> > searching code would be a better match to the problem than the
> > red-black approach.
> 
> Could you please elaborate more? I think the current VMA code is using
> red-black tree in their searching code(find_vma()).

I was thinking of the priority search tree stuff in mm/prio_tree.c.
But on further reflection, they're not really advantageous here as the
windows in question are non-overlapping and the RB approach looks
perfectly sensible.

-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/