RE: UDP recvmsg blocks after select(), 2.6 bug?

[David Schwartz]

> I don't think he is, but if he is:
>
> I'm not sure that either is reasonable behaviour. The socket buffers
> don't increase or decrease at run time, do they? If they do shrink at
> run time, this is news to me...

	The socket buffers are not guaranteed to indicate a particular number of
bytes in a sense that it meaningful to the application. In fact, on Linux,
they don't mean application bytes.

	In any event, we aren't talking about any particular implementation, we are
talking about a standard. So what Linux does or doesn't do in response to
memory pressure isn't relevant. What's relevant is what the standard
actually guarantees and what the semantics of the protocols themselves are.

	UDP is not reliable. Packets can be dropped, mangled, and lost. Nothing in
POSIX prohibits an implementation from dropping a packet right before you
call 'recvmsg'.

	DS


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/