Re: Add sparse "__iomem" infrastructure to check PCI address usage

From: Linus Torvalds
Date: Mon Sep 13 2004 - 09:46:50 EST




On Mon, 13 Sep 2004, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
> While resuming adding __user annotations to the m68k-specific parts of the
> code, I stumbled on
>
> struct task_struct {
> ...
> unsigned long sas_ss_sp;
> ...
> }
>
> If I'm not mistaken, sas_ss_sp is always a pointer to user stack space.
> Shouldn't it be changed to `void __user *sas_ss_sp', or is an
> unsigned long/void * change in generic code a too controversial change for
> making sparse happy?

I don't think it's too controversial per se, and it would certainly remove
at least two casts from kernel/signal.c. Are you ready to fix up some
other architectures from the fall-out (x86 at the least..)

Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/