Re: [Patch 0/6]: Cleanup and rbtree for ext3 reservations in2.6.9-rc1-mm4

From: Ram Pai
Date: Sun Sep 12 2004 - 03:03:21 EST


On 10 Sep 2004, Mingming Cao wrote:

> On Tue, 2004-09-07 at 06:02, Stephen Tweedie wrote:
> > The patches in the following set contain several cleanups for ext3
> > reservations, fix a reproducable SMP race, and turn the per-superblock
> > linear list of reservations into an rbtree for better scaling.
>
> > These changes have been in rawhide for a couple of weeks, and have
> > been undergoing testing both within Red Hat and at IBM.
> >
>
> We have run several tests on this set of the reservation changes. We
> compared the results w/o reservation, rbtree based reservation vs link
> list based reservation.

I have some more results at
http://eaglet.rain.com/ram/seekwrite/seekwrite.html

In summary reservation code performs better than non-reservation.
There is no clear winner while comparing link-based reservation v/s rbtree
reservation.

RP

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/