Re: [PATCH][5/8] Arch agnostic completely out of line locks / ppc64

From: Paul Mackerras
Date: Thu Sep 09 2004 - 18:41:16 EST


William Lee Irwin III writes:

> The semantics of profile_pc() have never included backtracing through
> scheduling primitives, so I'd say just report __preempt_spin_lock().

I disagree that __preempt_spin_lock is a scheduling primitive, or at
least I disagree that it is primarily a scheduling primitive. We
don't spend vast amounts of time spinning in any of the other
scheduling primitives; if we have to wait we call schedule().

Paul.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/