Re: reverse engineering pwcx

From: QuantumG
Date: Fri Aug 27 2004 - 22:13:25 EST


Craig Milo Rogers wrote:

Hmmm... a poster on Slashdot claims that entropy measurements
imply that the pwcx code is interpolating rather that truly
decompressing. Again, that's integer math and table lookups.



http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/B00005R098/102-7619892-0201738?v=glance

claims that the Logitech Quickcam Pro 3000 is a "True 640 x 480 resolution video capture" which is now clearly false.

It would appear I have found an answer to my question. The reason Philips made Nemosoft sign an NDA was not to hide proprietory information from their competitors. It was to hide the fact that they were misrepresenting the resolution of their cameras to their customers. No wonder Nemosoft did not feel right about opening this module even after the NDA expired, he would be telling the world their dirty little secret. Of course I'm sure this was common knowledge to all those people who work in robotics and always demand an uncompressed stream from the camera.

Trent Waddington
Decompiler maintainer, http://boomerang.sourceforge.net/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/