Re: Shouldn't kconfig defaults match recommendations in help text?

[Jesper Juhl]

On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Sam Ravnborg wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 07:03:55PM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > I'll post such patches in a short while. Sepperate mails, one pr patch 
> > changing one kconfig default pr patch.
> 
> One Kconfig file pr. patch makes more sense.
> 
You are right, I'll do that.

Which brings me to another thing regarding configs and defaults - there 
does not seem to be much relation between the defaults in the various 
Kconfig files and the settings in arch/<foo>/defconfig which puzzles me, 
especially since "make defconfig" seems to use the stuff from 
arch/<foo>/defconfig and not what's specified in Kconfig...
Wouldn't it make sense to update the defconfig's to match the Kconfig's 
when I make these changes?

--
Jesper Juhl

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/