Re: [PATCH] RCU - low-latency-rcu [3/3]

[Dipankar Sarma]

As promised in OLS, this patch introduces a throttling mechanism
for RCU callbacks. We should not be executing thousands of callbacks
from a single tasklet handler, that is not scheduler friendly.
I introduced a kernel paramenter (rcupdate.maxbatch) which
allows us to control how many callbacks per tasklet handler
are invoked. I have sanity tested this on both UP and SMP
x86 box with dcache heavy workload, there doesn't seem to be
any problem, leak or otherwise.

Thanks
Dipankar

This patch makes RCU callbacks friendly to scheduler. It helps
low latency by limiting the number of callbacks invoked per
tasklet handler. Since we cannot schedule during a single softirq
handler, this reduces size of non-preemptible section significantly,
specially under heavy RCU updates. The limiting is done
through a kernel parameter rcupdate.maxbatch which is the
maximum number of RCU callbacks to invoke during a single
tasklet handler.

Signed-off-by: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@xxxxxxxxxx>


 include/linux/rcupdate.h |    7 +++++++
 kernel/rcupdate.c        |   27 +++++++++++++++++++--------
 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff -puN kernel/rcupdate.c~low-latency-rcu kernel/rcupdate.c
--- linux-2.6.8-rc2-rcu/kernel/rcupdate.c~low-latency-rcu	2004-07-31 12:26:19.000000000 +0530
+++ linux-2.6.8-rc2-rcu-dipankar/kernel/rcupdate.c	2004-07-31 12:26:19.000000000 +0530
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@
 #include <asm/bitops.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/completion.h>
+#include <linux/moduleparam.h>
 #include <linux/percpu.h>
 #include <linux/notifier.h>
 #include <linux/rcupdate.h>
@@ -63,6 +64,7 @@ DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct rcu_data, rcu_data
 /* Fake initialization required by compiler */
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct tasklet_struct, rcu_tasklet) = {NULL};
 #define RCU_tasklet(cpu) (per_cpu(rcu_tasklet, cpu))
+static int maxbatch = 10;
 
 /**
  * call_rcu - Queue an RCU update request.
@@ -93,15 +95,23 @@ void fastcall call_rcu(struct rcu_head *
  * Invoke the completed RCU callbacks. They are expected to be in
  * a per-cpu list.
  */
-static void rcu_do_batch(struct rcu_head *list)
+static void rcu_do_batch(int cpu)
 {
-	struct rcu_head *next;
+	struct rcu_head *next, *list;
+	int count = 0;
 
+	list = RCU_donelist(cpu);
 	while (list) {
-		next = list->next;
+		next = RCU_donelist(cpu) = list->next;
 		list->func(list);
 		list = next;
+		if (++count >= maxbatch)
+			break;
 	}
+	if (!RCU_donelist(cpu))
+		RCU_donetail(cpu) = &RCU_donelist(cpu);
+	else
+		tasklet_schedule(&RCU_tasklet(cpu));
 }
 
 /*
@@ -261,11 +271,11 @@ void rcu_restart_cpu(int cpu)
 static void rcu_process_callbacks(unsigned long unused)
 {
 	int cpu = smp_processor_id();
-	struct rcu_head *rcu_list = NULL;
 
 	if (RCU_curlist(cpu) &&
 	    !rcu_batch_before(rcu_ctrlblk.completed, RCU_batch(cpu))) {
-		rcu_list = RCU_curlist(cpu);
+		*RCU_donetail(cpu) = RCU_curlist(cpu);
+		RCU_donetail(cpu) = RCU_curtail(cpu);
 		RCU_curlist(cpu) = NULL;
 		RCU_curtail(cpu) = &RCU_curlist(cpu);
 	}
@@ -300,8 +310,8 @@ static void rcu_process_callbacks(unsign
 		local_irq_enable();
 	}
 	rcu_check_quiescent_state();
-	if (rcu_list)
-		rcu_do_batch(rcu_list);
+	if (RCU_donelist(cpu))
+		rcu_do_batch(cpu);
 }
 
 void rcu_check_callbacks(int cpu, int user)
@@ -319,6 +329,7 @@ static void __devinit rcu_online_cpu(int
 	tasklet_init(&RCU_tasklet(cpu), rcu_process_callbacks, 0UL);
 	RCU_curtail(cpu) = &RCU_curlist(cpu);
 	RCU_nxttail(cpu) = &RCU_nxtlist(cpu);
+	RCU_donetail(cpu) = &RCU_donelist(cpu);
 	RCU_quiescbatch(cpu) = rcu_ctrlblk.completed;
 	RCU_qs_pending(cpu) = 0;
 }
@@ -388,6 +399,6 @@ void synchronize_kernel(void)
 	wait_for_completion(&rcu.completion);
 }
 
-
+module_param(maxbatch, int, 0);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(call_rcu);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(synchronize_kernel);
diff -puN include/linux/rcupdate.h~low-latency-rcu include/linux/rcupdate.h
--- linux-2.6.8-rc2-rcu/include/linux/rcupdate.h~low-latency-rcu	2004-07-31 12:26:19.000000000 +0530
+++ linux-2.6.8-rc2-rcu-dipankar/include/linux/rcupdate.h	2004-07-31 12:26:19.000000000 +0530
@@ -99,6 +99,8 @@ struct rcu_data {
 	struct rcu_head **nxttail;
         struct rcu_head *curlist;
         struct rcu_head **curtail;
+        struct rcu_head *donelist;
+        struct rcu_head **donetail;
 };
 
 DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct rcu_data, rcu_data);
@@ -113,6 +115,8 @@ extern struct rcu_ctrlblk rcu_ctrlblk;
 #define RCU_curlist(cpu) 	(per_cpu(rcu_data, (cpu)).curlist)
 #define RCU_nxttail(cpu) 	(per_cpu(rcu_data, (cpu)).nxttail)
 #define RCU_curtail(cpu) 	(per_cpu(rcu_data, (cpu)).curtail)
+#define RCU_donelist(cpu) 	(per_cpu(rcu_data, (cpu)).donelist)
+#define RCU_donetail(cpu) 	(per_cpu(rcu_data, (cpu)).donetail)
 
 static inline int rcu_pending(int cpu) 
 {
@@ -127,6 +131,9 @@ static inline int rcu_pending(int cpu) 
 	if (!RCU_curlist(cpu) && RCU_nxtlist(cpu))
 		return 1;
 
+	if (RCU_donelist(cpu))
+		return 1;
+
 	/* The rcu core waits for a quiescent state from the cpu */
 	if (RCU_quiescbatch(cpu) != rcu_ctrlblk.cur || RCU_qs_pending(cpu))
 		return 1;

_
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/