Re: [PATCH] Use NULL instead of integer 0 in security/selinux/

[H. Peter Anvin]

Florian Weimer wrote:
> * H. Peter Anvin:
>
>
> > Followup to:  <Pine.GSO.4.58.0407102126150.10242@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > By author:    Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
> >
> > >  - `return f();' in a function returning void (where f() returns void as well)
> >
> > Considering this one a bug is daft in the extreme.
> >
> > Why?  Because "return f();" is the only kind of tailcall syntax C has,
>
>
> Huh?  If you remove the "return", it's still a valid tailcall syntax
> (at least from GCC's perspective).

Yes, but as I said in the portion of the message you deleted, it means you 
have to use a different syntax with void functions as for all other functions.

That is daft in the extreme.

	-hpa

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/