Re: [PATCH] Use NULL instead of integer 0 in security/selinux/

[Miles Bader]

"David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> What's wrong with using 0 as the NULL pointer? In contexts where
>> a plain 0 is unsafe, NULL is usually unsafe as well.
>
> It's a general sparse cleanup people are doing across the entire tree.
> It's the "proper" way to do pointer comparisons post-K&R.

But 0 in such a context isn't an integer, it's a pointer...

If sparse really warns about such things, the warning seems wrong.

-Miles
-- 
((lambda (x) (list x x)) (lambda (x) (list x x)))
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/