Re: [PATCH] Permit inode & dentry hash tables to be allocated > MAX_ORDER size

From: Martin J. Bligh
Date: Sat Jun 12 2004 - 01:06:04 EST


>> Allocating the big-assed hashes out of bootmem seems much cleaner to me,
>> at least ...
>
> Machines big enough that such big hashes make sense are probably NUMA.
> And on NUMA systems you imho should rather use node interleaving vmalloc(),
> not a bit physical allocation on a specific node for these hashes.
> This will avoid memory controller hot spots and avoid the problem completely.
> Likely it will perform better too.

I thought Manfred already fixed all that up, didn't he?

M.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/