Re: [autofs] Badness in interruptible_sleep_on

From: Ian Kent
Date: Fri May 07 2004 - 01:36:48 EST



Not sure what needs to be done about this Paul.

I eliminated the interruptible_sleep_on in my autofs4 patches long ago.
The current updates are in 2.6.6-rc3-mm2.

As for autofs4 and 2.4 I have the impression that my changes have little
chance of being accepted and so haven't put the needed effort into
preparing them.

However, if you are looking to use the current patches please wait a
couple of days for the latest update.

On Fri, 7 May 2004, Paul Jakma wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I regularly get the following in my logs:
> Badness in interruptible_sleep_on at kernel/sched.c:1923
> Call Trace:
>
> [<c0120c9f>] interruptible_sleep_on+0x5a/0x230
> [<c01205a7>] default_wake_function+0x0/0xc
> [<d08ea491>] autofs4_wait+0x35d/0x509 [autofs4]
> [<c01c33dd>] inode_has_perm+0x57/0x5f
> [<d08e8572>] try_to_fill_dentry+0x39/0x25c [autofs4]
> [<c0173b4c>] do_lookup+0x54/0x72
> [<c01740e9>] link_path_walk+0x57f/0xcb1
> [<c0174b7d>] __user_walk+0x21/0x36
> [<c016f1ad>] vfs_lstat+0x11/0x37
>
> regards,
> --
> Paul Jakma paul@xxxxxxxx paul@xxxxxxxxx Key ID: 64A2FF6A
> warning: do not ever send email to spam@xxxxxxxxxx
> Fortune:
> Interchangeable parts won't.
>
> _______________________________________________
> autofs mailing list
> autofs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/