Re: 2.6.4 on Alpha uninterruptible sleep of processes

From: Ivan Kokshaysky
Date: Fri Mar 12 2004 - 18:03:17 EST

On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 09:52:15PM +0100, Marc Giger wrote:
> Right now I'm recompiling the kernel. So you say this patch isn't a fix
> but a test?

Yes. That patch just reverts new alpha semaphore stuff which went
into 2.6.4.

> This time I have additionally "semaphore debugging" enabled,
> perhaps it's useful for you.

Thanks, this might be helpful.

> > The answer is here:
> >
> That's no answer, that's a statement:-) Do know the exactly reason why
> it should be a bad idea? Is it mostly a bad idea on alpha?

Hmm, I haven't discussed that with Richard, so I can't speak for him :-)
IMHO, the benefits of the kernel preempt support in general are more than
doubtful, the level of complexity that it adds to the kernel code is
just unacceptable.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at