Re: anon_vma RFC2

From: Andrea Arcangeli
Date: Fri Mar 12 2004 - 16:01:35 EST

On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 03:32:20PM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
> That's not all anonymous memory, though ;)

true, my point is it's feasible (cow or shared is the same from a memory
footprint standpoint, actually less since anon_vmas are a lot cheaper
than dummy shmfs inodes)
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at