Re: 2.6.4-mm1

From: Andi Kleen
Date: Thu Mar 11 2004 - 22:16:12 EST

On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 07:04:50PM -0800, Nakajima, Jun wrote:
> As we can have more complex architectures in the future, the scheduler
> is flexible enough to represent various scheduling domains effectively,
> and yet keeps the common scheduler code simple.

I think for SMT alone it's too complex and for NUMA it doesn't do
the right thing for "modern NUMAs" (where NUMA factor is very low
and you have a small number of CPUs for each node).

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at