Re: 2.6.4-mm1

[Andi Kleen]

On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 07:04:50PM -0800, Nakajima, Jun wrote:
> As we can have more complex architectures in the future, the scheduler
> is flexible enough to represent various scheduling domains effectively,
> and yet keeps the common scheduler code simple.

I think for SMT alone it's too complex and for NUMA it doesn't do
the right thing for "modern NUMAs" (where NUMA factor is very low
and you have a small number of CPUs for each node). 

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/