Re: [Kgdb-bugreport] [PATCH] Kill kgdb_serial

From: Tom Rini
Date: Thu Mar 11 2004 - 18:03:55 EST


On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 02:53:34PM -0800, George Anzinger wrote:

> Tom Rini wrote:
> >On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 01:33:40PM -0800, George Anzinger wrote:
> >>Tom Rini wrote:
> >>>>I am afraid I don't quite understand what he was saying other than
> >>>>early init stuff. On of the problems with trying early init stuff, by
> >>>>the way, is that a lot of things depend on having alloc up and that
> >>>>happens rather late in the game.
> >>>
> >>>I assume you aren't talking about kgdb stuff here (or what would be the
> >>>point of going so early) but I believe he was talking about allowing for
> >>>stuff that could be done early, to be done early.
> >>
> >>One of the issues with the UART set up is registering the interrupt
> >>handler with the kernel. It will fail if alloc is not up. The -mm patch
> >>does two things with this. a) It tries every getchar to register the
> >>interrupt handler, and b) it has a module init entry to register it.
> >>This last will happen late in the bring up and is safe. a) is there to
> >>get it ASAP if you are actually using kgdb during the bring up.
> >
> >
> >There's two ways to look at this.
> >- All the more reason to acknowledge that the earliest you can safely
> > get into KGDB is point X, where X is where alloc works,
>
> Just to get ^C to work? I would rather give it up entirely!
> > mappings done
> > if needed, etc, etc, and IFF we change things slightly in kgdboe so
> > that it can call kgdb_schedule_breakpoint() if it needs to as an
> > initial break, and handle setting kgdb_serial to the serial driver in
> > kgdb_arch_init, or something, and remove all of the extra kludges to
> > get us a few lines / function calls earlier on.
> >- More and more special cases.
>
> How about a command line set up ASAP which calls a driver entry to do the
> break. The driver being serial does it NOW, but being some thing that
> needs additional resources, just sets a flag to break when it gets them and
> returns. Seems rather simple.

This sounds a lot like what I passed along from dwmw2 a week ago. :)

--
Tom Rini
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/