Re: (0 == foo), rather than (foo == 0)

[Bill Davidsen]

Stefan Smietanowski wrote:

> > But this works:  while (a = b, a != 0).
> > (not that it is any better readable :-) ).
>
>
> My eyes! *Starts clawing them out*

All in what you are used to reading. I grew up with ranges sepcified as 
something like
  0 <= x <= 40
in the spec, and therefore still write it like
  if (0 <= x && x <= 40)
because that makes it obvious (to me) that it's a range check.

A case of the language not having a range check operator and various 
people finding one thing or another readable.

--
		-bill
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/