RE: 2.6.4-mm1

[Nakajima, Jun]

Yes, we have been testing the sched-domain scheduler. So far, the
results are all positive. We'll add more stress to it, running various
workloads.

Jun
>-----Original Message-----
>From: linux-kernel-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-kernel-
>owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Andrew Morton
>Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 11:32 PM
>To: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: 2.6.4-mm1
>
>
>ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.4/2.6
.4-
>mm1/
>
>
>
>- The CPU scheduler changes in -mm (sched-domains) have been hanging
about
>  for too long.  I had been hoping that the people who care about SMT
and
>  NUMA performance would have some results by now but all seems to be
>silent.
>
>  I do not wish to merge these up until the big-iron guys can say that
they
>  suit their requirements, with a reasonable expectation that we will
not
>  need to churn this code later in the 2.6 series.
>
>  So.  If you have been testing, please speak up.  If you have not been
>  testing, please do so.
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/