Re: [RFC] different proposal for mq_notify(SIGEV_THREAD)

[Manfred Spraul]

Jamie Lokier wrote:

> The difference is that your proposal eliminates those fds.
> But there is no reason that I can see why mq_notify() should be
> optimised in this way and futexes not.
>  
I would start with message queues, but the mechanism must be generic 
enough to be used for futexes, etc.

The main open question is if I should write something new or if I can 
reuse netlink.

--
   Manfred

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/