Re: (0 == foo), rather than (foo == 0)
From: Bernd Petrovitsch
Date: Wed Mar 10 2004 - 05:37:17 EST
Reformatted long lines - please fix your mailer.
On Mit, 2004-03-10 at 07:16, Godbole, Amarendra (GE Consumer &
Industrial) wrote:
> While writing code, the assignment operator (=) is many-a-times confused
> with the comparison operator (==) resulting in very subtle bugs difficult
> to track. To keep a check on this -- the constant can be written on the
> LHS rather than the RHS which will result in a compile time error if wrong
> operator is used.
Or you use `gcc -Wall` which also reports this (and also in the cases
where both sides of the comparison can be left hand sides).
Bernd
--
Firmix Software GmbH http://www.firmix.at/
mobil: +43 664 4416156 fax: +43 1 7890849-55
Embedded Linux Development and Services
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/