Re: ACPI PM Timer vs. C1 halt issue

[Prakash K. Cheemplavam]

john stultz wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-03-09 at 13:35, Prakash K. Cheemplavam wrote:
>
> > I found out what causes higher idle temps when using mm-sources and 
> > 2.6.4-rc vanilla sources: If I use PM Timer as timesource, it seems the 
> > C1 halt isn't properly called, at least CPU disconnect doesn't seem to 
> > work, thus leaving my CPU as hot as without disconnect.
[snip]
> Sounds like a bug. I'm not very familiar w/ the ACPI cpu power states,
> is there anything you have to do to trigger C1 Halt? Or is it just
> called in the idle loop?

It should be called within the idle loop.

bye,

Prakash
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/