Re: [PATCH] Missing return value check on do_write_mem

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Tue Mar 09 2004 - 16:46:56 EST


BlaisorBlade <blaisorblade_spam@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> In drivers/char/mem.c do_write_mem can return -EFAULT but write_kmem forgets
> this and goes blindly.
>
> Note: /dev/kmem can be written to only by root, so this *cannot* have security
> implications.
>
> Also, do_write_mem takes two unused params and is static - so I've removed
> those. I actually double-checked this - however please test compilation on
> Sparc/m68k, since there are some #ifdef.
>

It's a small thing, but:

> --- ./drivers/char/mem.c.fix 2004-02-20 16:27:21.000000000 +0100
> +++ ./drivers/char/mem.c 2004-03-08 12:17:23.000000000 +0100
> @@ -96,13 +96,14 @@
> }
> #endif
>
> -static ssize_t do_write_mem(struct file * file, void *p, unsigned long realp,
> - const char * buf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
> +static ssize_t do_write_mem(void *p, const char * buf, size_t count,
> + loff_t *ppos)
> {
> - ssize_t written;
> + ssize_t written = 0;
>
> - written = 0;
> #if defined(__sparc__) || (defined(__mc68000__) && defined(CONFIG_MMU))
> + unsigned long realp = *ppos;
> +

A thread which shares this fd can alter the value at *ppos at any time via
lseek() .

> /* we don't have page 0 mapped on sparc and m68k.. */
> if (realp < PAGE_SIZE) {
> unsigned long sz = PAGE_SIZE-realp;
> @@ -165,7 +166,7 @@
>
> if (!valid_phys_addr_range(p, &count))
> return -EFAULT;
> - return do_write_mem(file, __va(p), p, buf, count, ppos);
> + return do_write_mem(__va(p), buf, count, ppos);
> }
>
> static int mmap_mem(struct file * file, struct vm_area_struct * vma)
> @@ -276,7 +277,9 @@
> if (count > (unsigned long) high_memory - p)
> wrote = (unsigned long) high_memory - p;

Here we have applied a range check.

> - wrote = do_write_mem(file, (void*)p, p, buf, wrote, ppos);
> + wrote = do_write_mem((void*)p, buf, wrote, ppos);

But here we go off and use *ppos, which may now have a different value from
that which we just range-checked.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/