MM VM patches was: 2.6.3-mm4

[Mike Fedyk]

Andrew Morton wrote:
> shrink_slab-for-all-zones.patch
>   vm: scan slab in response to highmem scanning
>
> zone-balancing-fix.patch
>   vmscan: zone balancing fix

On 2.6.3 + [1] + nfsd-lofft.patch running on a 1GB ram file server.   I 
have noticed two related issues.

First, under 2.6.3 it averages about 90MB[2] anon memory, and 30MB with 
the -mm4 vm (the rest is in swap cache).  This could balance out on the 
normal non-idle week-day load though...

Second the -mm4 vm, there is a lot more swapping[3] going on during the 
daily updatedb, and backup runs that are performed on this machine.
I'd have to call this second issue a regression, but I want to run it a 
couple more days to see if it gets any better (unless you agree of course).

Mike

[1]
instrument-highmem-page-reclaim.patch
blk_congestion_wait-return-remaining.patch
vmscan-remove-priority.patch
kswapd-throttling-fixes.patch
vm-dont-rotate-active-list.patch
vm-lru-info.patch
vm-shrink-zone.patch
vm-tune-throttle.patch
shrink_slab-for-all-zones.patch
zone-balancing-fix.patch
zone-balancing-batching.patch

[2]
http://www.matchmail.com/stats/lrrd/matchmail.com/fileserver.matchmail.com-memory.html

[3]
http://www.matchmail.com/stats/lrrd/matchmail.com/fileserver.matchmail.com-swap.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/