Re: reiserfs for bkbits.net?

[Måns Rullgård]

Sander <sander@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Larry McVoy wrote (ao):
>> We're moving openlogging back to our offices and I'm experimenting
>> with filesystems to see what gives the best performance for BK usage.
>> Reiserfs looks pretty good and I'm wondering if anyone knows any
>> reasons that we shouldn't use it for bkbits.net. Also, would it help
>> if the journal was on a different disk? Most of the bkbits traffic is
>> read so I doubt it.
>> 
>> Please cc me, I'm not on the list.
>
> I've cc'ed the Reiserfs mailinglist.
>
> IME Reiserfs is a fast and stable fs. If you have the time to benchmark
> ext3, reiserfs, jfs and xfs (and ..) with bk then you would know first
> hand which fs is best for you. It might be worth the time.

If someone does any tests, I'd be interested to hear about the
results.

-- 
Måns Rullgård
mru@xxxxxx

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/