Re: won't work: 2.6.0 && SiI 3112 SATA
From: Steffen Beyer
Date: Wed Jan 07 2004 - 07:17:18 EST
- Next message: Jesper Juhl: "Re: Suspected bug infilesystems (UFS,ADFS,BEFS,BFS,ReiserFS) relatedto sector_t being unsigned, advice requested"
- Previous message: Oleg Drokin: "Re: Suspected bug infilesystems (UFS,ADFS,BEFS,BFS,ReiserFS) related to sector_t being unsigned, advice requested"
- In reply to: Prakash K. Cheemplavam: "Re: won't work: 2.6.0 && SiI 3112 SATA"
- Next in thread: Karel Kulhavý: "Re: won't work: 2.6.0 && SiI 3112 SATA"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, 06 Jan 2004 16:09:16 +0100
"Prakash K. Cheemplavam" <PrakashKC@xxxxxx> wrote:
> I am not Jeff but, SATA is embedded SCSI infrastructure, thus you get
> sda device.
Not with the libata VIA driver.
> Performace is so bad because of workaround for Seagate drives (max
> 15kb/transfer or alike). HDParm won't help you.
I had to apply the mm patch for 2.6 to get the full performance out of my
3112 (also Seagate drives) using the IDE (non-libata) driver. Didn't test
libata for the 3112 after applying.
Regards,
--
Steffen Beyer <sbeyer@xxxxxxxxxx>
GnuPG key fingerprint: 6C9B 2844 AF75 AC7A C38C 9FFD 06CB A788 398B D2D9
Public key available upon request or at http://wwwkeys.pgp.net
Attachment:
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Next message: Jesper Juhl: "Re: Suspected bug infilesystems (UFS,ADFS,BEFS,BFS,ReiserFS) relatedto sector_t being unsigned, advice requested"
- Previous message: Oleg Drokin: "Re: Suspected bug infilesystems (UFS,ADFS,BEFS,BFS,ReiserFS) related to sector_t being unsigned, advice requested"
- In reply to: Prakash K. Cheemplavam: "Re: won't work: 2.6.0 && SiI 3112 SATA"
- Next in thread: Karel Kulhavý: "Re: won't work: 2.6.0 && SiI 3112 SATA"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]