Re: Suspected bug infilesystems (UFS,ADFS,BEFS,BFS,ReiserFS) relatedto sector_t being unsigned, advice requested
From: Hans Reiser
Date: Tue Jan 06 2004 - 18:28:12 EST
- Next message: Pawel Kot: "Re: 2.4.24 asm/timex.h"
- Previous message: Mario ''Jorge'' Di Nitto: "Re: [Oops] 2.6.1-rc1-mm1 and Sisfb"
- In reply to: Mike Fedyk: "Re: Suspected bug infilesystems (UFS,ADFS,BEFS,BFS,ReiserFS) related to sector_t being unsigned, advice requested"
- Next in thread: Jesper Juhl: "Re: Suspected bug infilesystems (UFS,ADFS,BEFS,BFS,ReiserFS) relatedto sector_t being unsigned, advice requested"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jesper Juhl wrote:
Also, I did a build of fs/reiserfs/ both with and without the above patch,
and then did a disassemble of inode.o (objdump -d) and compared the
generated code for reiserfs_get_block , and the generated code is
byte-for-byte identical in both cases, which means that gcc realizes that
the if() statement will never execute and optimizes it away in any case.
I think you have done too much work.;-)
Thanks though.
The only reason we are slow in processing your patch and forwarding it
to Linus is that the Russian Christmas is today....
--
Hans
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Next message: Pawel Kot: "Re: 2.4.24 asm/timex.h"
- Previous message: Mario ''Jorge'' Di Nitto: "Re: [Oops] 2.6.1-rc1-mm1 and Sisfb"
- In reply to: Mike Fedyk: "Re: Suspected bug infilesystems (UFS,ADFS,BEFS,BFS,ReiserFS) related to sector_t being unsigned, advice requested"
- Next in thread: Jesper Juhl: "Re: Suspected bug infilesystems (UFS,ADFS,BEFS,BFS,ReiserFS) relatedto sector_t being unsigned, advice requested"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]