Re: hmm..

From: Felipe Alfaro Solana
Date: Mon Dec 22 2003 - 20:17:19 EST

Next message: Stan Bubrouski: "Re: SCO's infringing files list"
Previous message: Nick Piggin: "Re: [PATCH] 2.6.0 batch scheduling, HT aware"
In reply to: bert hubert: "Re: hmm.."
Next in thread: Gene Heskett: "Re: hmm.."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, 2003-12-22 at 22:31, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> In other words, I think we can totally _demolish_ the SCO claim that these
> 65 files were somehow "copied". They clearly are not.

It seems they keep Smoking Crack (TM)...

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Stan Bubrouski: "Re: SCO's infringing files list"
Previous message: Nick Piggin: "Re: [PATCH] 2.6.0 batch scheduling, HT aware"
In reply to: bert hubert: "Re: hmm.."
Next in thread: Gene Heskett: "Re: hmm.."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]