Re: Linux GPL and binary module exception clause?

[Arjan van de Ven]

On Fri, 2003-12-05 at 20:09, Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx wrote:
\
> Interestingly enough, at least on my Fedora box, 'rpm -qi' reports glibc as LGPL,
> but glibc-kernheaders as GPL, which seems right to me - linking against glibc gives
> the LGPL semantics as we'd want, but forces userspace that's poking in the kernel
> to be GPL as a derived work....

but those headers do not have inlines etc etc 
just the bare minimum of structures and defines (neither of which result
in code in the binary )

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part