Re: 2.7 thoughts: common well-architected object model

From: Mark Hahn
Date: Sat Oct 11 2003 - 13:21:25 EST

Next message: Jonathan McDowell: "Interrupt routing (was Re: 8139too & APIC incompatibility (2.6.0-test6-mm1, 2.4.20))"
Previous message: owen: "Kernel Panic on 2.6.0-test5 with XFS filesystem"
In reply to: asdfd esadd: "Re: 2.7 thoughts: common well-architected object model"
Next in thread: Zwane Mwaikambo: "Re: 2.7 thoughts: common well-architected object model"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, 11 Oct 2003, asdfd esadd wrote:

yah, right. could you please move this to comp.os.design.masturbation?

thanks!

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jonathan McDowell: "Interrupt routing (was Re: 8139too & APIC incompatibility (2.6.0-test6-mm1, 2.4.20))"
Previous message: owen: "Kernel Panic on 2.6.0-test5 with XFS filesystem"
In reply to: asdfd esadd: "Re: 2.7 thoughts: common well-architected object model"
Next in thread: Zwane Mwaikambo: "Re: 2.7 thoughts: common well-architected object model"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]