Re: 2.7 thoughts: common well-architected object model
From: Valdis . Kletnieks
Date: Sat Oct 11 2003 - 09:31:25 EST
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 21:45:14 PDT, asdfd esadd said:
> * a unified well architected core component model
> which is extensible
OK.. now for the terminally dense readers of the list like myself, could
you repeat that in terms that people who have more experience in
slinging C code than buzzwords will understand and rally behind?
Most of the time when I hear "component", somebody's trying to invent
yet another message-passing paradigm. And although there's certainly
a place where things like CORBA and the dbus stuff solve problems,
you have to remember that this is a Linux kernel, not Mach....
Alternatively, explain to me what this component model will do for us
that updating the docs on the kernel API won't?
Attachment:
pgp00001.pgp
Description: PGP signature